A blog dedicated to photographs of churches and church architecture in the Rocky Mountain West.
Thursday, February 23, 2023
Wyoming Catholic Cowboys - raw and real: Ash Wednesday
Wednesday, February 22, 2023
A Lenten Plea for the Working Man.
I used to go to daily Mass, save for Saturdays.
I no longer do, as the Mass I went to, daily, was cancelled.
In every Parish which is served by an attendant pastor, there is daily Mass. Locally, there are three parishes, and they all have a daily mass. Their schedules are:
Downtown:
6:30 a.m.
East:
9:00
West:
9:00.
And that's why I don't go to daily Mass.
9:00 a.m is a time guaranteed to wipe out any working person from attendance. If you have a job, you are not making it.
6:30 a.m. is pretty early in the morning.
Now, it could be argued that, well, anyone could make that.
Not hardly. Again, if you work, that means that you pretty much have to be prepared to go to your office by about 6:00 a.m. It's 5:35 a.m. as I start writing this, and I'm still trying to wake up from not getting enough sleep the night before, drinking my coffee.
Today, I have to shave, shower, put on my lawyer costume and head out the door prepared to take on the plethora of other people's problems I deal with every day. I'm not going to be able to do that, and make a 6:30 a.m. Mass.
I could make a noon Mass, and that's the daily Mass I used to attend.
I certainly wasn't alone, there were always others there. By and large, they were people who walked up from their offices or drove there. Working people who came on their lunch hour, skipping lunch,.
Indeed, I often notice, as I sometimes drive by when its getting out, that early morning attendees downtown have a sort of social schedule built into attendance at that Mass. Not all of them, by any means, but some.
And that's 100% okay.
What I mean is that I see them walking from Mass to a nearby café. They probably do that all the time. I don't have time, however, to engage in that sort of activity in the morning, and I probably wouldn't go to a café in the morning much if I did. I point that out, however, as the people who hiked up at noon were giving their lunches up, in some cases, just to be there. They were dedicated.
I fear, sometimes, that it's easy to forget the working folks. They don't say much, they just go to their jobs and back, and come on in on Sunday. They aren't retired, so they don't have time to get to a 9:00, and frankly a lot of them couldn't easily make a 6:30.
Noon worked great.
Tuesday, February 21, 2023
Wednesday, March 2, 2022
Ash Wednesday 2022. A day of fasting and prayer for Peace.
Today, March 2, 2022, is Ash Wednesday for this year.
The Pope has also asked for it to be a day of fasting for peace, with the war in Ukraine in mind.
St. John's Ukrainian Catholic Church. Belfield, North Dakota
Belfield, North Dakota has a population of 800 people and four Catholic Churches, which says something about the nature of this region of the United States. One of those four, St. John's, is a Ukrainian Catholic Church.
We featured a Ukrainian Catholic Church here for the first time yesterday. Here we are doing it for a second time in the same region, and in fact at a location that's only a few miles down the highway from the one we featured yesterday.
In parts of the United States we've featured before, such as East Texas, seeing something like this in regards to Baptist churches wouldn't be unusual. Here we're seeing a much different cultural history at work, and a very interesting one at that.
St. Demetrius Ukrainian (Greek) Catholic Church. Fairfield, North Dakota
This is St. Demetrius Ukrainian Catholic Church which is outside of Fairfield, North Dakota. The church is over a century old and gives testament to the enduring Ukrainian presence in the prairie states and provinces of the West.
This is one of several Ukrainian Catholic churches in western North Dakota and its the first Ukrainian Catholic Church to be featured here (a prior entry on the topic of the Ukrainian Catholic Church referenced a biritual priest then in Lander Wyoming. People with a casual familairity with the Catholic Church tend to believe that all Catholic Churches are "Roman" Catholic, but this is far from true.
Just as Catholic as "Roman" (Latin Rite) Catholic Churches, the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, to give it its full name, is one of a collection of Eastern Rite Catholic Churches. The Catholic Church features three major groupings of Rites based on this initial early transmission of the faith. These are the Latin, Antiochian, Alexandrian and Byzantine, with the Byzantine having derived from the Antiochean. All still survive in spite of the rift created by the Great Schism which caused separate churches that are not in communion with Rome, typically called "Orthodox" churches, to also come into existence which also descend from all but the Latin Rite. From these four groups come something on the order of twenty three Rites, of which the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church is one.
The history of this particular Rite is not well known to me and it is difficult to fully know it without an in depth study. This is part made confusing because it is one of the two major churches of the Ukraine, both of which use the Eastern Rite liturgical form, but only one of which is in communion with Rome. The other major Ukrainian Church, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, is an Eastern Orthodox Church (usually called "the Greek Church" by native Ukrainians) which is regarded as a self governing church by the Russian Orthodox Church, but only by the Russian Orthodox Church.
The Ukrainian Catholic Church has an ancient history dating back to the Christianization of the Ukraine itself. Because of the Ukraine's close association with Russia there has always been some tension between its status and that of the Russian Orthodox Church and this was greatly increased during the life of the Soviet Union as the USSR suppressed and drove underground the Ukrainian Catholic Church while favoring the Russian Orthodox Church. Today the Ukrainian Catholic Church is claimed to have the allegiance of a minority but growing percentage of the population of the Ukraine, at the expense of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, but frankly telling what is what in regards to this history is difficult.
This church predates the establishment of the USSR, of course, and reflects a strong late 19th Century and early 20th Century Ukrainian migration to the prairie regions of North America. Coming from a wheat growing region and stemming from a population of independent small farmers, Ukrainians were reestablishing that pattern of life on the North American prairie. It's perhaps telling that so many Ukrainian Catholic Churches are present in this region, rather than Russian Orthodox, and that either says something about the populations that migrated or the allegiance of Ukrainians at that time.
The Ukrainians have proved to be enduring as a culture in North American in these regions, which these churches show. In terms of their organizational structure, while fully Catholic (any Catholic is free to worship at any Catholic church, irrespective of Rite) they are subject to their own jurisdiction. Therefore, they are not part of the Diocese of Bismarck, but rather the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Saint Nicholas of Chicago, which covers over half of the United States and all of the western United States.
Indeed, in recent years the Ukranian nature of this Eastern Rite church, together with the Slavic and Eastern nature of the second major Eastern Rite Catholic Church in the United States, the Byzantine Catholic Church (sometimes called the Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church) have increased. In the late 19th Century the Church in the United States had a Latinization policy in an attempt to unite all Catholics in North America more fully under the belief that this would help incorporate Catholics into society more ably, but this has been reversed. At the present time the Catholic Church has sought to preserve the Eastern Rites wherever possible and this has lead to a de-Latinization process and a revival of practices that never diminished in Europe.
Which doesn't stop us from noting the tragedy, including the religious tragedy, this war entails.
Indeed, in some ways, Ukraine itself embodies certain tragedies uniquely, including the Great Schism. In the west, the dominant church is the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. In the rest of the country, it's the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, save for some areas, where it's the Russian Orthodox Church.
Now, a person must be honest in this. Religion took a pounding in Ukraine during the Soviet years. The USSR violently suppressed Ukraine itself, and then in the Leninite and pre World War Two Stalinist years it suppressed all religion violently. This eased up during the Second World War, but it revived under Khrushchev. The Communists, however, were never able to make the Faith away, and while it did succeed in reducing the faithful in Ukraine, the Church remains very influential there today.
But when we say church, obviously, we mean churches. Contrary to what is commonly believed, the desire to return to communion with Rome existed in certain quarters in the Russian Orthodox Church, but it was violently suppressed. During the Soviet era, the Ukrainian Catholic Church was suppressed even more, with only the Russian Orthodox Church, itself under repression, being allowed in any form. The Ukrainian Catholic Church nonetheless persevered.
So did a sense of Ukrainian Orthodoxy. This led it to seek autocephalous status within the Orthodox communion, which was recognized by the Greek Orthodox Metropolitan in 2019. The Russian Orthodox Church refused to recognize this, leading to a schism within the Eastern Orthodox communion.
All of this is noted as one of Putin's think excuses for invading Ukraine is that Ukraine was attacking the Church. It clearly was not, but Ukrainians clearly don't see themselves as Russians. Putin has been seen in Russian Orthodox services from time to time, and since the fall of Communism, Orthodoxy has roared back into prominence in Russia.
This is not, however, a just war, and the citations to preserving Orthodoxy. . . .?
Today is a day of fast and abstinence for Catholics. It could be, as the Pope desires, a day for fasting and prayer for Peace. All Christians can unite in that.
Wednesday, November 18, 2020
November 18, 1966. The Latin Rite of the Catholic Church relaxes the Abstention Rule.
On this day the Latin Rite Catholic Bishops of the United States relaxed the rule on abstaining from meat on Fridays throughout the year. This followed a Papal direction in 1962 that the Friday penitential requirement be adopted to local conditions, reflecting a move by the Church focused on that goal. The same move resulted in the vernacular replacing Latin in the Mass at about the same time.
In the case of the Catholic Bishops of the United States the removal has created some confusion. Fridays retain their penitential character and Catholics are urged to substitute something for abstaining from meat but few do. Indeed, there's debate on whether there's any requirement to do and the fine, orthodox, Catholic apologist maintains there is not. Some others maintain there very much is, with those holding that view tending towards the Catholic Trad community.
To the surprise of American "Roman" Catholics, the rule was not done away with globally and it remains a matter of Church law in many other localities in the world. It also remains one, of course, during Lent.
There are a lot of rumors in the Protestant world about this practice, a lot of which are frankly absurd. Old anti Catholic myths regarding fish on Fridays were one of the things that I still heard in school when I was a teen, usually centered around some completely bogus economic theory. The actual basic reason for the practice is that it was a remaining Latin Rite penitential practice of which there had once been many, but which had dwindled down to just a few in the Latin Rite over time. In the Eastern Rite and the Orthodox Churches, however, they remain numerous and occur throughout the year.
Indeed, the practice in the Eastern Rite and Orthodox Churches is instructive in that their fasts often extend beyond abstaining from meat and to other things. During Great Lent, for example, they ultimately extend to oils, dairy and alcohol.
The reason for abstention from meat (there was never any requirement that people actually eat fish) reflected the logistical economy of an earlier time. Today fish is readily available on the table no matter where you are, but in earlier times this wasn't so. Abstention from meat limited diets and protein sources other than fish were regarded, and frankly usually still are, as more celebratory. People like fish, of course, but not too many people are going to sit down to a big Thanksgiving dinner of flounder. The goal wasn't to starve people, but to focus on penance while still sustaining their needs. Limiting food to the plain, and fish for most people, if available, was plain, emphasized that.
As with a lot of things, over time in Protestant countries this practice tended to mark Catholics and also became subject to silly myths. Even now, over fifty years after the practice was relaxed in the United States, you'll occasionally find somebody who will insult Catholics with a derogatory nickname from the era related to fish. Likewise, like a lot of dietary practices that have long ceased, people born far too late to really experience "fish on Fridays" will claim they did.
Ironically, of course, fish has gone from a less favored food even fifty years ago to a dietary and culturally prized one. It's one of the odd ways in which the religious practices of Catholics, to include fasting, has come back around as a secular health practice. And as Catholic orthodoxy has returned as the Baby Boomers wane, fish on Fridays has been reintroduced voluntarily among some orthodox or simply observant Catholics, even where they are not required to do it.